Every architecture project holds a new promise. For me, this promise is simple—it is to design spaces that improve the well-being of the people who use them and to do better for the planet we rely on.

What we’re getting wrong
The issue is: when we only focus on efficiency—cramming in as much space as possible—we end up with spaces that feel, well, soulless. No cross-ventilation, not enough daylight, and everyone feels boxed in. And if we swing too far the other way—prioritizing comfort or aesthetics without considering the environmental impact—we end up with buildings that are overusing land and resources. The real challenge is balancing both: creating spaces that are carbon-efficient but also good to live and work in.

Optimizing building performance
We’re at a point where cities like LA need more housing and workspaces—urgently. But we also have to face the fact that how we’ve been building for decades is part of the climate problem. The way I see it, every new project is a chance to cut carbon emissions—whether that’s through smarter design, reduced construction waste, or how a building uses energy over its lifetime. Designed right, every part of the building lifecycle is part of the solution.

At the same time, let’s not forget who we’re building for—people. Our buildings should do more than just house us. They should give us access to things that actually make life better: natural light, fresh air, and a connection to nature and our community. I believe these elements are crucial for our well-being, and they shouldn’t be afterthoughts in design.

Cutting CO2 and improving well-being
Look, if we’re serious about cutting CO2 and improving how people live, we need to reassess our approaches. We can’t just keep doing what we’ve always done and expect different results. It’s time for a shift in how we design and build. I’m talking about spaces that work for the environment and the people who use them. That’s where the future is, and it’s a future we can start building right now.

29 Sep 2024